Skip to content

Pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements

Advising on the certainty and security that nuptial agreements could provide, whether before or after a marriage.

Line drawing of a couple signing agreement documents at a table, wedding rings between them

What this covers

A nuptial agreement records what each party would walk away with if the marriage were to end. A pre-nuptial agreement is signed before the wedding; a post-nuptial agreement is the same document drafted after it — the purpose, the protections and the legal weight are the same. Sensible reasons for putting one in place include assets brought into the marriage, family wealth or an inheritance, a business being built, and children from an earlier relationship. Nuptial agreements are not automatically binding in English law, but well-drafted agreements with full financial disclosure and independent legal advice on both sides are taken seriously by the court and usually shape the financial outcome closely. Fixed fees are available.

How we can help

  • Engaged, with significant assets, family wealth or a business to protect
  • Already married, and putting protection in place now — perhaps because an inheritance, a business sale or a windfall has changed the picture
  • Marrying again, with children from earlier relationships
  • Reconciling after a difficult patch
  • Wishing the conversation about a pre-nup had happened, and wanting to have it now

Common pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements questions

  • What is the difference between a pre-nup and a post-nup?

    Only the timing. A pre-nuptial agreement is signed before the wedding; a post-nuptial agreement is signed after it. The purpose, the protections, the disclosure and the legal treatment are otherwise the same. Where a pre-nup was not put in place at the time, a post-nup is the same document drafted later.

  • Are nuptial agreements enforceable in England?

    Not automatically, but they carry real weight. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Radmacher v Granatino [2010], the courts will give effect to nuptial agreements freely entered into, with full disclosure and independent advice on both sides, unless it would be unfair to do so. A well-drafted agreement that meets those conditions usually shapes the outcome closely.

  • When should a pre-nup be signed?

    At least twenty-eight days before the wedding. The principle is that no one should be signing in the rush of the wedding itself, where free choice and pressure become blurred. Earlier is better — three to six months out is sensible.

  • Does it have to be fair?

    Yes, and that is the test that matters most. Even where there has been disclosure and independent advice, the court can decline to follow an agreement it considers unfair on the day the marriage ends, particularly where children's needs are not met. We draft with fairness in mind, because fair agreements are the ones the court honours.

  • Can we change it later?

    Yes. Nuptial agreements should be reviewed and varied as life moves on — children arrive, circumstances shift, assets are bought or sold. Building in a regular review point, every five years or following a major life event, is sensible practice.

  • What happens if we do divorce?

    The agreement is one of the first documents the court will look at. Where it was properly entered into and remains fair on the day, it tends to shape the financial settlement closely. It does not replace the consent order, but it heavily influences what goes into one.

  • Do we both need our own solicitor?

    Yes, and we insist on it. We can act for one party; the other party must take advice from a solicitor of their own choosing. Without independent advice on both sides, the document is far easier to challenge later — which defeats the purpose of putting it in place.

Not sure where to start?

An introductory call of up to twenty minutes is free of charge — an opportunity to explain your position and feel reassured that we are the right fit.

Plain English. Confidential. No obligation.

Coloured line drawing of a solicitor and a client talking across a small table